Jennifer Connelly and Zendaya were rated by Twitter used and people lost it.
A Twitter troll going by the handle @CristusVictor has gotten a lot of attention after comparing Zendaya and Jennifer Connelly and saying they were only a 7 on his beauty scale.
@CristusVictor stated that women from the 1990s were far more attractive than women today, pinning a photo of Connelly from the 1990s alongside a photo of Zendaya without makeup.
1990s Jennifer Connelly with today’s Zendaya
Any zoomer who thinks right pic is above average attractive doesn't understand that in the 90s, a "7" looked like left pic.
"Above average" meant something else back then. There'd be like ten girls
as or more beautiful than Connelly working at every chain restaurant. pic.twitter.com/rjg9ZPU2g5— Sun Optimist (@CristusVictor) April 15, 2023
“Any zoomer who thinks the right pic is above average attractive doesn’t understand that in the 90s, A ‘7’ looked like the left pic, ‘Above average’ meant something else back then. There’d be like ten girls as or more beautiful than Connelly working at every chain restaurant.”
Immediately, fans of both A-listers came to the rescue and began an online debate
“Jennifer Connelly was a dream girl in the 90s and she’s still a dream girl to many of the same people today. Zendaya will follow a similar path, I’m sure,” added one. “I don’t understand this need to compare and contrast two entirely different people. Life is not a competition.”
>full face of makeup in a glamour shot
>tabloid shot in pajamas and low on sleep
>WHICH WAY MODERN MAN?!?!?!?!?!?— Daxed (@ScorchedtheSou1) April 16, 2023
“You took a photo of a woman with heavy makeup, her hair done, and CLEARLY posing, and compared it to an off-the-cuff, no makeup, messy hair photo,” one user remarked. “You’re definitely trying way too hard to prove ur weak point, buddy.”
Another was perplexed by what he was reading, saying, “Dude Jennifer Connelly has always been a 10 what are you talking about?”
There are always people who agree with the unpopular opinion
However, people on both sides are always present. “The combined number for these two is…generously, an 8,” a critic added.
https://twitter.com/BrandiLynn4Ever/status/1647396639210983427?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1647396639210983427%7Ctwgr%5E4681b887e4e7b526aa68dc457d96a629540863e2%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.marca.com%2Fen%2Flifestyle%2Fmovies%2F2023%2F04%2F18%2F643ebc2a22601d8c6c8b4591.html
And there’s this tweet from someone who agreed with the man. “Truth. Looking through my high school yearbook, I see that half of my graduating class in the mid-1990s would be considered ‘hot’ now,” adding, “Almost universally slim, smiling faces, unjaded, not a trace of SSRI-tainted eyes.” It was great, man.”
