Alban Bagbin, the Speaker of Ghana’s Parliament, has made several decisions that have stirred significant controversy. His rulings have highlighted the complexities and tensions in Ghanaian parliamentary politics. Here are five notable rulings by Bagbin that sparked debate:
1. Rejection of the 2022 Budget
In November 2021, Bagbin presided over a session where the 2022 budget statement was rejected. With the National Democratic Congress (NDC) MPs walking out, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) MPs couldn’t meet the quorum for a valid vote. This led to a constitutional debate, with the NPP challenging the legality of the ruling and accusing Bagbin of bias.
2. Handling of the E-Levy Debate
During the heated discussions over the controversial Electronic Transactions Levy (E-Levy), Bagbin’s decisions to suspend and adjourn sessions drew heavy criticism. Some viewed his actions as favoring the opposition, causing delays in the legislative process and heightening tensions between the two main political parties.
3. Ruling on Majority Status
In January 2021, Bagbin ruled that the independent MP for Fomena, who aligned with the NPP, couldn’t be counted as part of the NPP’s parliamentary group for determining a majority. This decision impacted the NPP’s claim to a majority in Parliament, sparking intense debates about parliamentary procedure and constitutional interpretation.
4. Approval of Ministerial Appointments
Bagbin’s role in the approval process for ministerial appointments has also been contentious. His decisions on whether certain votes met the required majority were questioned. For instance, during the approval of Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta, Bagbin’s interpretation of the voting rules and subsequent rulings were hotly debated, with accusations of partisanship from both sides.
5. Handling of Parliamentary Scuffles
Bagbin’s management of physical altercations in Parliament, particularly during discussions of the E-Levy and the 2022 budget, has been controversial. His decisions on security and disciplinary measures during these scuffles were seen as either too lenient or too harsh, depending on political perspectives. These incidents underscored the difficulties of maintaining order in a deeply polarized parliamentary environment.
Bagbin’s rulings reflect the contentious nature of Ghanaian politics and the challenges of navigating a divided legislative landscape.
